← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
VanagonEuroVan
Sort by authorSort by posting dateSort by topicChronological orderMost recent firstShow authorHide authorShow table of contentsHide table of contentsBack to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGONSearch
Subject:Re: An interesting article on gas mileage vs wheel size
From:Chris S <szpejankowski@GMAIL.COM>
Date:Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:29:39 -0400

Under some circumstances you will actually reduce the tire/wheel package
weight.  I lost 6lb per corner in rotational weight by replacing stock
steel wheels and 195R14 tires with Mercedes CLK 16'' forged alloys and
215/65 R 16 tires.

2011/10/29 Ken Lewis <kdlewis@northstate.net>

> I found this article while researching what it would take to get 17"x7.5"
> Audi A4  wheels to work on my crewcab.
>
> This line caught my eye;" What's immediately apparent from the results is
> that as the wheel-and-tire packages get larger and heavier, acceleration
> and
> fuel economy suffer. Neither is a huge surprise, but we measured a
> 10-percent drop in fuel economy and a four-percent degradation in
> 0-to-60-mph acceleration from the 15s to the 19s".
>
> I  looked at  these this morning.
> http://winstonsalem.**craigslist.org/pts/2618213904.**html<http://winstonsalem.craigslist.org/pts/2618213904.html>. Nice looking BIG
> wheels. Some road rash. He also has the longer lug bolts.
>
> The bolt hole size is good but it appears the center bore (~57mm) would
> need
> to be opened up. I need to actualy take a front wheel off my truck and do
> some measuring . I have read the grease cap can be shortened to get rid  of
> the lip.
>
> I arrived at a  back spacing of 137.25mm on the Audi wheels . By my
> calculations I would need a 14mm spacer? Anyone?
>
> Thanks Ken
>

--
Chris S.
"No solution is too complex to be executed incorrectly"

Back to November 2011, week 1
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »